SLOGAM

Slogam 1
Slogam 2
Slogam 3
Slogam 4
Slogam 5
Slogam 6
Slogam 7
Slogam 8
Slogam 9
Slogam 10
Slogam 11
Slogam 12
Slogam 13
Slogam 14
Slogam 15
Slogam 16
Slogam 17
Slogam 18
Slogam 19
Slogam 20
Slogam 21
Slogam 22
Slogam 23
Slogam 24
Slogam 25
Slogam 26
Slogam 27
Slogam 28
Slogam 29
Slogam 30
Slogam 31
Slogam 32
Slogam 33
Slogam 34
Slogam 35
Slogam 36
Slogam 37
Slogam 38
Slogam 39
Slogam 40
Slogam 41
Slogam 42-43
Slogam 44
Slogam 45
Slogam 46
Slogam 47
Slogam 48
Slogam 49
Slogam 50
Slogam 51
Slogam 52
Slogam 53
Slogam 54
Slogam 55
Slogam 56
Slogam 57
Slogam 58
Slogam 59
Slogam 60
Slogam 61
Slogam 62
Slogam 63
Slogam 64
Slogam 65
Slogam 66
Slogam 67
Slogam 68
Slogam 69
Slogam 70
Slogam 71
Slogam 72

Bhagavad Gita Chapter 2.19

ya enaḿ vetti hantāraḿ

yaś cainaḿ manyate hatam

ubhau tau na vijānīto

nāyaḿ hanti na hanyate

Translation

Neither he who thinks the living entity the slayer nor he who thinks it slain is in knowledge, for the self slays not nor is slain.

Author Name:-Sri Ramanuja

Purport

Sri Ramanuja

2.19 With regard to “This” viz., the self, whose nature has been described above, he who thinks of It as the slayer, i.e., as the cause of slaying, and he who thinks ‘This’ (self) as slain by some cause or other — both of them do not know. As this self is eternal for the reasons mentioned above, no possible cause of destruction can slay It and for the same reason, It cannot be slain. Though the root ‘han’ (to slay) has the self for its object, it signifies causing the separation of the body from the self and not destruction of the self. Scriptural texts like ‘You shall not cause injury to beings’ and ‘The Brahmana shall not be killed’? (K. Sm. 8.2) indicate unsanctioned actions, causing separation of the body from the self. [In the above quotes, slaughter in an ethical sense is referred to, while the text refers to killing or separating the self from the body in a metaphsyical sense. This is made explicit in the following verse].

Author Name:-Sri Adi Shankaracharya

Purport

Sri Adi Shankaracharya

2.19 But the ideas that you have, ‘Bhisma and others are neing killed by me in war; I am surely their killer’ — this idea of yours is false. How? Yah, he who; vetti, thinks; of enam, this One, the embodied One under consideration; as hantaram, the killer, the agent of the act of killing; ca, and; yah, he who, the other who; manyate, thinks; of enam, this One; as hatam, the killed — (who thinks) ‘When the body is killed, I am myself killed; I become the object of the act of killing’; ubhau tau, both of them; owing to non-discrimination, na, do not; vijanitah, know the Self which is the subject of the consciousness of ‘I’. The meaning is: On the killing of the body, he who thinks of the Self (– the content of the consciousness of ‘I’ –) [The Ast. omits this phrase from the precedig sentence and includes it in this place. The A.A. has this phrase in both the places.-Tr.] as ‘I am the killer’, and he who thinks, ‘I have been killed’, both of them are ignorant of the nature of the Self. For, ayam, this Self; owing to Its changelessness, na hanti, does not kill, does not become the agent of the act of killing; na hanyate, nor is It killed, i.e. It does not become the object (of the act of killing). The second verse is to show how the Self is changeless:

Author Name:-Sri Madhvacharya

Purport

Sri Madhvacharya

In the minds of living entities identifying themselves only as their physical bodies, or as their species, planet, or country as the case may be; the declaration that one who thinks that one can be factually slain or one who thinks that one can factually slay are both deluded, poses bewilderment. What can be factually slain is the physical body but not the embodied soul. The living entity becomes alive only by the energising facility of the Supreme Lord by the activation of the soul. Thus the Supreme Lord is always to be worshipped and glorified.

Now begins the summation.

If the statement one who thinks the living entity is able to kill another living entity independently on their own would be considered then the statement of the Supreme Lord in chapter 11, verse 34 kill those whom have already been killed by Me would be contradictory. The word hantaram being applicable to the soul is applicable to the Supreme Lord as well.

SLOGAM

CATEGORIES

Slogam 19

Bhagavad Gita Chapter 2.19

Related to Veda :